Frankfurt and Miller disagree in their philsophies about truth. Frankfurt simply believes that truth is totally objective, and there is no room for personal interpretation or indivdual bias. He also goes as far as stating that without an objective truth society becomes chaotic and unruly. Miller proposes truth subjectively, and does not believe there is a perfect philospohy that can't be proven untrue. Frankfurt suggests that his philosophy on truth is proven when data is falsifiable or not, while Miller ignores so called "concrete facts" and calls for the recollection of the individual who told the account.
Posted by jsteb on November 30, 2008
Tags Uncategorized
Comments on specific paragraphs:
Click the
icon to the right of a paragraph
Comments on the page as a whole:
Click the
icon to the right of the page title (works the same as paragraphs)